Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 110) Professor Bloom opens with a brief discussion of the value and evolutionary basis of unconscious processing. The rest of this lecture introduces students to the theory of Behaviorism, particularly the work of prominent behaviorist, B. F. Skinner. Different types of learning are discussed in detail, as well as reasons why behaviorism has been largely displaced as an adequate theory of human mental life. 00:00 - Chapter 1. A Brief Review on the Unconscious 06:32 - Chapter 2. B. F. Skinner and Behaviorism 11:45 - Chapter 3. Habituation: The Very Simplest Form of Learning 14:25 - Chapter 4. Classical Conditioning: Associating Stimulus 31:18 - Chapter 5. Operant Conditioning: Operating on the Environment 45:12 - Chapter 6. Question and Answer on Behaviorism 46:44 - Chapter 7. Controversies and Criticisms on Behaviorism Complete course materials are available at the Yale Online website: online.yale.edu This course was recorded in Spring 2007.
Views: 347838 YaleCourses
Want more videos about psychology every Monday and Thursday? Check out our sister channel SciShow Psych at https://www.youtube.com/scishowpsych! What does Psychology mean? Where does it come from? Hank gives you a 10 minute intro to one of the more tricky sciences and talks about some of the big names in the development of the field. Welcome to Crash Course Psychology!!! -- Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support CrashCourse on Subbable: http://subbable.com/crashcourse
Views: 7770778 CrashCourse
A Presentation on the Behaviorist Theory of SLA by Michelle Payne & Sharon Sitler References Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. (pp. 19-31). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. Peregoy, S. F., and Boyle, O. (2008). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book for teaching K-12 English Learners. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (pp. 50-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Views: 188927 Sharon
A discussion between B. F. Skinner and Geoffrey Warnock. Hosted by Godfrey Vesey. 1972
Views: 12656 Biophily2
Breger was born and grew up in Los Angeles, California. He received his undergraduate education at Cornell University and U.C.L.A., following which he obtained his Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology at The Ohio State University in 1961. He then taught at the University of California, Berkeley, the University of California Medical School in San Francisco, and the University of Oregon. In 1970 Breger became Visiting Associate Professor of Psychology then Professor of Psychoanalytic Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences Division of the California Institute of Technology. He graduated from the Southern California Psychoanalytic Institute in 1979, where he became a Training and Supervising Analyst and was the recipient of the Franz Alexander Essay Award and the Distinguished Teaching Award. In 1990, he resigned from that institution and, with a group of colleagues, created the Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis (ICP) where he was the Founding President from 1990 to 1993. ICP reflected Breger’s commitment to an open, democratic form of education: it is a non-hierarchical training institute, not affiliated with the American Psychoanalytic Association. He is the father of three grown children and two stepsons, married to Barbara Gale Breger; together, they have 13 grandchildren. Breger has been both a practicing psychotherapist and a faculty member at several universities where he carried out research on dreams, reformulations of psychoanalytic theory, psychotherapy process and outcome, personality development, and the application of psychoanalysis to literature. He has also published two biographies of Sigmund Freud. He has always taken a critical stance towards psychoanalysis, as revealed in most of his publications. His work on dreaming – using the REM techniques of monitoring sleep through the night – showed that dreams are symbolic attempts to master emotional conflicts that have been aroused during the pre-sleep period, in contrast to Freud’s wish fulfillment theory (see Function of Dreams, 1967). His work on personality development – as found in his book From Instinct to Identity – is an integration of theory and research from child development, John Bowlby, Erik Erikson, Harry Stack Sullivan, Freud, Jean Piaget, primate studies, and research on hunter-gatherer societies. The study of Dostoevsky treats him as a fellow “psychoanalyst” who has much to teach us rather than a patient to be “analyzed.” The two biographical studies of Freud bring out the personal – often traumatic – roots of what is valuable and problematic in psychoanalytic theory and therapy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Breger
Views: 1471 The Film Archives
Transcription - http://www.lib.uci.edu/sites/questforpeace/index.php?page=skinner
Views: 27606 Quest For Peace
This Business Ethics Lesson introduces and defines business ethics concepts such as principles, morals, values, social responsibility, along with a brief history of business ethics in the 1960s, business ethics in the 1970s, business ethics in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s up to more recent trends. Business Ethics Enron, Safe at Any Speed by Ralph Nadar, Religion, Lehman brothers, business ethics profits, consumers' bill of rights, the Defense Industry Initiative on Business Ethics and Conduct (DII), The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (FSGO), Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Ethical Culture http://www.subjectmoney.com http://www.subjectmoney.com/articledisplay.php?title=Business%20Ethics:%20The%20History,%20Emergence%20and%20the%20Importance%20of%20Business%20Ethics
Views: 107571 Subjectmoney
Erik Dempsey, Post-Doctoral Fellow, University of Texas at Austin October 1, 2010
Views: 214 CTI @ UT Austin
What is development...? What are the theories of development...? What is the concept of development...? Hello Everyone, My name is Ram Chandra Paudel, I'm a student of M.Sc. IEM from IOE. Here is a presentation about 'CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT' which is presented during the class assignment. This is for education purpose, and I hope this gives the viewer quick idea about DEVELOPMENT & THEORIES. 0:09 - Definition of Development 0:19 - Todaro 3 Objectives of Development 0:32 - Development Theories: • 0:35 - Modernization Theory - 1960s • 0:46 - Dependency Theory - 1970s • 0:56 - Globalization Theory - 1980s • 1:06 - Sustainable Development Theory - 1987 • 1:16 - Human Development Theory - 1990s • 1:26 - Post-Development Theory - 2000s 1:33 - Prespective of Development Hope you enjoy this video. Please don't forget to like, share & Subscribe My YouTube Channel for more educational and engineering related videos. ► Subscribe Here: https://www.youtube.com/c/RCPaudel?sub_confirmation=1 #References: • Meier, GM and JE Stiglitz (2001), Frontiers of Development Economics, The Future in Perspective, World Bank, and Oxford University Press. • Theories of development, Royal Geographical Society with IBG, www.rgs.org • Theories of Development, a Paper by Bubaker F. Shareia, Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of Benghazi, Libya published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol 2, 1st March 2015. • The sociological study on environmental conservation as a means of achieving sustainable development in rural areas in Rwanda, Vianney NSANGANIRA National university of Rwanda - Bachelor's degree in sociology 2011. • Development theory, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_theory In my Youtube Channel, you can find engineering tutorials and tech tips of your need through hundreds of cool videos. Tips, tricks, and techniques and special promotion. ► Subscribe Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1VvirT6LyGp5ryVT2OG8Kg?sub_confirmation=1 #More_Videos: ► 10-Life Changing Quotes of All Time: https://youtu.be/dXe3kYMmj5I ► Self Introduction Presentation: https://youtu.be/z4FOgHvPAKY ► Concept of Development: https://youtu.be/45r01e6Uv8U ► All About EIA: https://youtu.be/qcmHoFmQPZU ► VIC - Model Overview: https://youtu.be/7gGbg_2PosM ► Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: https://youtu.be/aqJ9MgbHn74 ► Electricity Acts of Nepal: https://youtu.be/BPjD0F4GE3c ► Calculate Your Life Insurance Premium Easily: https://youtu.be/ibs8vhuYOQA ► Draw, Develop & Fabricate A Concentric Reducer - Complete Tutorial: https://youtu.be/WEowYOA3Rzs ► Draw a Penstock Pipe Bend In AutoCAD: https://youtu.be/4pwNtEztaKw ► Calculation of Compound Bend Angle: https://youtu.be/yE89-qhXZ1w Please do subscribe my channel and hit like if you find my contents really useful for you.... and if you think this content might help others too, please don't forget to share. Thank You...! ► Subscribe Here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1VvirT6LyGp5ryVT2OG8Kg?sub_confirmation=1 ► Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/EngineerSathi
Views: 11187 Engineer Sathi | इन्जिनियर साथी
Imperial hosted talks by Professors Fay Dowker and Jerome Gauntlett as part of the international celebrations of the 100th anniversary of Albert Einstein's Field Equations defining the Theory of General Relativity. Chaired by Imperial's Provost Professor James Stirling, with a message from Professor Stephen Hawking. Professors Dowker and Gauntlett were both members of Professor Hawking's research group at the University of Cambridge. The talks at the event: Inner space, outer space: A meditation on general relativity Professor Fay Dowker, Professor of Theoretical Physics Professor Dowker did her PhD in Cambridge under the supervision of Stephen Hawking, graduating in 1990. She has since held research positions at FermiLab (Chicago), University of California Santa Barbara and Caltech, before joining Queen Mary University of London and then Imperial in 2003. Her research focuses on the causal set approach to quantum gravity. Black holes and the unity of physics Professor Jerome Gauntlett, Head of the Theoretical Physics Group at Imperial College London Professor Gauntlett's research focuses on string theory, black holes and quantum field theory. He moved from Australia to Cambridge to carry out his PhD in Stephen Hawking’s Relativity Group, graduating in 1991. He then held research positions at the University of Chicago and Caltech before returning to the UK, first to Queen Mary University of London and then to Imperial in 2003. Jerome was the Theoretical Physics Consultant on the Oscar-winning film The Theory of Everything. Interact on social media via the hashtag #GR100. The Theoretical Physics Group at Imperial College London was founded in by Nobel Laureate Abdus Salam. The Group uncovers and investigates the fundamental laws of Nature that govern phenomena ranging from cosmology down to particle physics. Members of the Group carry out world-leading research into some of the most exciting areas of theoretical physics today, including string theory, quantum field theory, cosmology, quantum foundations and gravity. Research highlights include Salam being awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in for his seminal work on unifying the electromagnetic force with the weak nuclear force. Group member Sir Tom Kibble was one of six scientists who discovered the mechanism behind symmetry breaking that eventually led to the discovery of the Higgs boson at the Large Hadron Collider in 2013.
Views: 9224 Imperial College London
Help us keep this channel producing REAL content for REAL people https://www.paypal.me/ConservativeResurge The cultural Marxism that our societies are infected with is a particularly Western phenomenon. After the Russian Revolution of 1917, Marxists in Europe believed that the dictatorship of the proletariat was at hand. They were wrong. The revolution failed to spread. In despair, and in one of Mussolini’s prisons, a young Italian socialist Antonio Gramsci wrote that the problem was the Christian bedrock of Western European cultures. He encouraged Marxists to develop a fifth column inside these countries to destroy the foundations of Western cultures. Only then would international socialism be achievable. This call to subversion was picked up by Marxist scholars based around the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, Germany. In the tumultuous milieu of Weimar Germany, theorists such as Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse, Erich Fromm, Theodor Adorno and Georg Lukacs integrated the theories of Sigmund Freud with classical Marxism to develop the foundations of critical theory, deconstructionism, post-structuralism and postmodernism. Known as the Frankfurt School, many of these intellectuals fled Hitler’s Germany for the United States where they were welcomed by Progressives and socialist intellectuals. The theories of the Frankfurt School unified the vanguard of the 60’s countercultural movement and have since spread to every discipline in our universities, colleges and schools. These theories, which obsess about colonization, subjugation and oppression, have indeed colonized higher education in the West. Marxism is always cloaked in high-sounding utopian rhetoric. This is a ruse. What cultural Marxists seek has nothing to do with true diversity, social harmony or universal tolerance. They don’t want the races getting along. They seek power. The solution for the perceived injustices that Cultural Marxists have manufactured is radical social engineering. The power to carry out this social engineering must be given, of course, to a politically-correct elite determined to remake society along ideological lines. This is why cultural Marxists always seek to enter government, academe or influential positions in the media. In the process of remaking society, unsurprisingly, these Cultural Marxists gain enormous wealth, status and power. This is how careers and fortunes are made in the industry of grievance. It is also why Marxism is so appealing to the ambitious and unscrupulous. Thus it is no surprise that the groups which cultural Marxists have labelled victims are themselves now worse off than ever. The decline of black America over the last fifty years has been a modern tragedy. Across all metrics, black communities have been deteriorating. The solution loudly demanded by cultural-Marxist opportunists is always more of the same, thus accelerating the decline of these communities Marxism proved over the twentieth century that it is the deadliest and most destructive belief system on the planet. It has a body count beyond measure and has left a trail of brokenness, suffering and desolation wherever it has taken hold. Marxist ideology destroyed the traditional civilizations of Europe and Asia until they renounced it in the 1990’s. It is in the West that it has lived on in hybrid form, gnawing away at the fabric of our societies. That fabric will not hold forever. Every knee taken, every glass bottle thrown and every incitement to victimhood is another crack in the unity of the nation; and without unity there can be no United States. Link to Article: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/10/marxism_and_education.html
Views: 8120 Conservative Resurgence
A first look at confidence in sport and exercise, and how to become more confident. Special thanks to interviewee Liam Scott-Gunfield, 0:21 Inro 2:06 Social Cognitive Theory 4:37 Vealey's Theory 5:30 Attribution Theory 7: 56 Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------- Part 1: Becoming Confident Part: 2: Overconfidence Part 3: Self-Efficacy and Social cognitive theory in Sport & Exercise Part 4: Vealey's Theory part 5: Atribution theory in Sport & Exercise part 6: Strategies to becoming confident ------------------------------------------------------------------ References Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Bandura, A. (1988). Perceived self-efficacy: Exercise of control through self-belief. In J. P. Dauwalder, M. Perrez, & V. Hobi (Eds.) Ericsson, K.A., R.T. Krampe, and C. Tesch-Romen; (1993) . The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Kanfer, R., (1990). Motivational goal theory and industrial organisation.
Views: 222 Immersive Sports Science
Want more videos about psychology every Monday and Thursday? Check out our sister channel SciShow Psych at https://www.youtube.com/scishowpsych! Feeling motivated? Even if you are, do you know why? The story of Aaron Ralston can tell us a lot about motivation. In this episode of Crash Course Psychology, Hank tells us Ralston's story, as well as 4 theories of motivation and some evolutionary perspectives on motivation. -- Table of Contents Four Theories of Motivation: Evolutionary Perspective 1:38:22 Drive-Reduction 2:45:10 Optimal Arousal 3:38:21 Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 4:49:04 How Sex, Hunger, and the Need to Belong Motivate us 5:29:02 -- Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support CrashCourse on Subbable: http://subbable.com/crashcourse
Views: 1731364 CrashCourse
Hank gets real with us in a discussion of evolution - it's a thing, not a debate. Gene distribution changes over time, across successive generations, to give rise to diversity at every level of biological organization. Crash Course Biology is now available on DVD! http://dft.ba/-8css Like CrashCourse on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Follow CrashCourse on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Table of Contents 1) The Theory of Evolution 1:49 2) Fossils 2:42 3) Homologous Structures 4:36 4) Biogeography 7:02 5) Direct Observation 8:52 References for this episode can be found in the Google document here: http://dft.ba/-2Oyu evolution, theory, biology, science, crashcourse, genetics, gene, facts, fossil, fossil record, dinosaur, extinct, extinction, organism, dorudon, rodhocetus, vestigial, structure, similarity, homologous structure, related, relationship, morganucodon, fore limb, hind limb, vertebrate, molecule, DNA, RNA, chimpanzee, fruit fly, biogeography, marsupial, finches, direct observation, drug resistance, resistance, selective pressure, italian wall lizard Support CrashCourse on Subbable: http://subbable.com/crashcourse
Views: 1584675 CrashCourse
The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens Monday, February 5, 2018 Encina Hall, Bechtel Conference Center It is widely held today that in designing public policy and legal systems, we should assume that people --whether citizens, employees, business partners, or potential criminals -- are entirely self-interested and amoral. Given this assumption’s currency in legal, economic, and policy-making circles, it may seem odd that nobody really believes that people are really like that. Instead, the assumption of amoral self-interest has been advanced on grounds of prudence, not realism. But it is anything but prudent to let Homo economicus be the behavioral that underpins public policy. There are two reasons. First, the policies that follow from this paradigm sometimes make the assumption of universal amoral selfishness more nearly true than it might otherwise be: People sometimes act in more self-interested ways in the presence of incentives than in their absence. The reason, however, may not be incentives per se but instead, the pursuit of economic aggrandizement and control with which they are frequently associated. Second, fines, rewards, and other material inducements often do not work very well. No matter how cleverly designed, incentives cannot alone provide the foundations of good governance. An erosion of the ethical and other social motivations essential to good government could be an unintended cultural consequence of policies that economists have favored, including more extensive and better-defined private property rights, enhanced market competition, and the greater use of monetary incentives to guide individual behavior. I show that these and other policies advocated as necessary to the functioning of a market economy may also promote self-interest and undermine the means by which a society sustains a robust civic culture of cooperative and generous citizens; they may even compromise the social norms essential to the workings of markets themselves. Even more than in the past, high-performance knowledge-based economies today require the cultural underpinnings of social norms. Among these is the assurance that a handshake is indeed a handshake; where one doubts this, as Kenneth Arrow pointed out long ago, mutual gains from exchange may be limited by distrust. SAMUEL BOWLES is Research Professor at the Santa Fe Institute where he heads the Behavioral Sciences Program. He taught economics at Harvard from 1965 to 1973 and since then at the University of Massachusetts, where he is now emeritus professor, and at the University of Siena from 2002 to 2010, where he continues to occasionally teach. Bowles' current research also includes theoretical and empirical studies of political hierarchy and wealth inequality and their evolution over the very long run. His studies on cultural and genetic evolution have challenged the conventional economic assumption that people are motivated entirely by self-interest. Recent papers have also explored how organizations, communities and nations could be better governed in light of the fact that altruistic and ethical motives are common in most populations. The McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society is committed to bringing ethical reflection to bear on important social problems through research, teaching, and engagement. Visit the Center's website for more information: http://ethicsinsociety.stanford.edu
Views: 1158 EthicsinSociety
Death (PHIL 176) The lecture focuses on the question of the metaphysical key to personal identity. What does it mean for a person that presently exists to be the very same person in the future? The first approach to answering this question is the "soul theory," that is, the key to being the same person is having the same soul. Difficulties with that approach are then discussed, independent of the question whether souls exist or not. 00:00 - Chapter 1. Introduction 01:39 - Chapter 2. What Does It Mean to Survive? The Train Metaphor 14:04 - Chapter 3. The Aging of a Car and Space-Time Worms 30:30 - Chapter 4. Will I Survive My Death? The Dualist's Soul as the Metaphysical Glue 46:28 - Chapter 5. Is the Soul Truly the Key to Personal Identity? Complete course materials are available at the Yale Online website: online.yale.edu This course was recorded in Spring 2007.
Views: 87182 YaleCourses
Moral Foundations of Politics (PLSC 118) Today, Professor Shapiro dives more deeply into Robert Nozick's theory of the minimal, or night watchman, state. This formulation is not redistributive, nor does it consider rights as goals, but rather as side-constraints on what we can do. In other words, Nozick's is a deontological, not teleological, approach. However, the Achilles' heel of this formulation is the incorporation of independents, based on a system of compensation. Some people will opt not to enter into our hypothetical social contract, but for the dominant protective association to protect its members from the fear of these independents, they must be forced to incorporate. Nozick thinks that if members could compensate the independents for this rights violation, it would legitimize the state. Unfortunately, no one has ever solved the puzzle of compensation without some interpersonal comparison of utility. But another way to salvage Nozick's account is with the Kantian dictum "ought entails can," meaning that since independents cannot be tolerated, it cannot be an obligation not to violate their rights. But what if the independents could compensate the members for their fear? And couldn't this compensation model be used to justify the welfare state as well? Isn't the value of consent, in which Nozick's account is rooted, completely violated here? 00:00 - Chapter 1. Evolution of the State without Rights Violations 15:50 - Chapter 2. Nozick's Theory of the Only Legitimate State 20:57 - Chapter 3. A Compensation Test That Is Compatible with the Pareto System 23:17 - Chapter 4. Neoclassical Utilitarianism: The Pareto Diagram Complete course materials are available at the Open Yale Courses website: http://open.yale.edu/courses This course was recorded in Spring 2010.
Views: 19959 YaleCourses
This two-day symposium explores Warburg's ideas and their adumbrations, e.g., his preoccupations with - and intuitions about - memory, both in relation to different forms of artistic creation and in anticipation of concepts related to neuroplasticity and neuroesthetics; the significance and fluency of the image - its elliptical and metaphoric functions - and of affect for the phenomena and qualia of chronology and memory, in concert with contemporary understanding of the dynamic unconscious; and the interdisciplinary mode of thought - the philosophical and art historical, cosmographic and historical - at the heart of Warburg's atlas. Schedule for Saturday, October 12th: 4:15 pm: Classical & Renaissance Art roundtable: Georges Didi-Huberman, Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann, François Quiviger, Dorothea Rockburne, and Christopher Wood Georges Didi-Huberman, philosopher and art historian, teaches at the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales) in Paris, where he has been a lecturer since 1990. He is a winner of the Distinguished Lifetime Achievement Award for Writing on Art given by the College Art Association. Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann is Frederick Marquand Professor of Art and Archaeology, Princeton University. He received degrees from Yale, the Warburg Institute, and Harvard, and has been awarded honorary doctorates by the Technical University, Dresden, and the Masaryk University, Brno. The holder of the Palacký medal from the Czech Academy of Sciences, he is a member of the Swedish, Flemish, and Polish Academies of Science, and has been a Fellow of the American Academies in Berlin and Rome, among other honors and Fellowships. He is the author or editor of many books and articles on historiography, geography of art, art and science, Central European art and architecture 1450-1800, and global exchange in art.He is now writing about global exchange in art and world art history. François Quiviger took his Ph.D. from the Warburg Institute, London, where he works as curator of digital resources, librarian, and researcher. He has written, taught, and curated projects on early modern European academies, on mythology and on Renaissance material culture, art and art theory.His recent book, The Sensory World of Italian Renaissance Art (London, Chicago 2010), explores the presence and function of sensation in Renaissance ideas and practices, investigating their link to mental imagery and how Renaissance artists made touch, sound, and scent palpable to the minds of their audience. Dorothea Rockburne was born in Montreal. She was educated at the Montreal Museum School and at Black Mountain College, where she studied with, among other contemporaries, Philip Guston and Franz Kline, as well as the German mathematician Max Dehn, whose teachings, merging the mathematical and natural worlds, provided her with new and complex approaches to her work. Her interests in the Golden Mean, astronomy, cosmology, and lifelong fascination with Egyptians' use of proportion and light, additionally shaped her oeuvre.Working with both industrial and natural materials, she paints, cuts, draws, folds and calculates to create complex works of art built upon mathematical foundations. Christopher Wood (A.B., Harvard 1983, Ph.D., Harvard 1991) has been teaching at Yale since 1992. He is currently Visiting Professor in the German Department, New York University, and has taught as a visitor at the University of California (Berkeley), Vassar College, and the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Views: 4770 helixcenter
Understanding Aboriginal Identity explores the complex issue of self-identification for Aboriginal people. Today, Aboriginal identity remains inextricably linked with past government legislation and the continued stereotyping of Aboriginal people in the media and Canadian history. From a Metis farm in rural Alberta, to the offices of Canada’s leading scholars, Understanding Aboriginal Identity examines the factors that shape who we are. To order this video please go to www.bearpaweducation.ca/videos
Views: 73622 BearPaw Legal
This is the 2018 Chorley Lecture delivered at the London School of Economics & Political Science by Prof. Adrian Vermeule, the Ralph S. Tyler, Jr. Professor of Constitutional Law of Harvard Law School. Title: The Publius Paradox: On the Dangers of a Weak Executive Speaker: Professor Adrian Vermeule Date: June 05, 2018 Venue: Shaw Library, Old Building, London School of Economics and Political Science Adrian Vermeule is the Ralph S. Tyler, Jr. Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard Law School. Before coming to Harvard, he was the Bernard D. Meltzer Professor of Law at the University of Chicago. He is the author or co-author of nine books, most recently Law’s Abnegation: From Law’s Empire to the Administrative State (2016), The Constitution of Risk (2014) and The System of the Constitution (2012). He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2012. His research focuses on administrative law, the administrative state, the design of institutions, and constitutional theory. Vermeule graduated from Harvard College in 1990 and Harvard Law School in 1993. The Lecture will be held at 6pm on Tuesday 5 June 2018 at the Shaw Library, Old Building, London School of Economics and Political Science. Adrian Vermeule is the Ralph S. Tyler, Jr. Professor of Constitutional Law. Before coming to the Law School, he was the Bernard D. Meltzer Professor of Law at the University of Chicago. The author or co-author of nine books, most recently Law's Abnegation: From Law's Empire to the Administrative State (2016), The Constitution of Risk (2014) and The System of the Constitution (2012). He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2012. His research focuses on administrative law, the administrative state, the design of institutions, and constitutional theory. Having grown up in Cambridge and attended Harvard College '90 and Harvard Law School '93, Vermeule lives in Cambridge still. The Chorley Lecture is an annual lecture inaugurated in 1972 and named in honour of Lord Chorley of Kendal, the founding editor of the Modern Law Review. The Lecture, which is normally delivered in late May or early June at the London School of Economics & Political Science, is the most important occasion in the calendar of the Review. A version of the lecture is subsequently published as the lead article in the January issue of the following year’s Review.
Views: 1304 Lei Sun
To watch Part 1 of our vlog, click here: https://youtu.be/lAsuev7M0CY To see footage from Bandura's Bobo doll experiment, click here: https://youtu.be/zerCK0lRjp8 Sources: Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 1977. 84(2): p. 191-215. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Miller, N.E., J. Dollard, and R. Yale University. Institute of Human, Social learning and imitation. 1941, New Haven; London: Pub. for the Institute of human relations by Yale university press; H. Milford, Oxford university press. http://study.com/academy/lesson/albert-bandura-social-cognitive-theory-and-vicarious-learning.html
Views: 368 Pamela Bussey
This documentary DVD was produced in 1997 and forms part of the Bringing them home education resource for use in Australian classrooms. For more on the report see: https://bth.humanrights.gov.au/ This resource is based on 'Bringing them home' , the report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families, and on the history of forcible separation and other policies which have impacted on the lives of Indigenous Australians. This documentary complements a collection of curriculum-linked activities and teaching resources, plus a range of photographs, maps and diagrams, timelines, legal texts and glossaries. The Australian Human Rights Commission invites teachers and students to use this resource to explore, understand and reflect on one of the most difficult chapters of our national history and to engage with some of the key concepts involved in the reconciliation debate in Australia. For the education resource see: https://www.humanrights.gov.au/education/human-rights-school-classroom Warning: This video may contain images / voices of deceased Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons. Video produced by Oziris. © Australian Human Rights Commission
Views: 124152 Australian Human Rights Commission
Cultural Psychiatry: a Critical Introduction. Lecture 9 The mental health of indigenous peoples pt 1. Dr. Laurence Kirmayer discusses the impacts of colonization on health, and identity, adaptation and the problem of suicide in indigenous populations. Part of the Summer Program in Social and Cultural Psychiatry from the Division of Transcultural Psychiatry.
Views: 2221 Transcultural Psychiatry
Lecture date: 2014-12-08 A Theory and two Projects Vittorio Magnago Lampugnani, architect in Milan and teacher at ETH in Zurich, considers urban design neither a science nor an art, but a craft. Less a matter of strokes of genius than one of patiently building on foundations that need to be rediscovered. In his view, the history of urban architecture can be interpreted and used as a memory-bank of strategies; and the city is a productive spatial and ideological device that promotes the construction and refinement of a community. His theoretical approach towards the contemporary city, articulated in several essays and books, has materialized in two major urban projects bearing his signature: the Novartis campus in Basel, a city of interdisciplinary interactive research, and the Richti-Quartier near Zurich, a new neighbourhood with apartments, offices, shops and remarkable public spaces. Vittorio Lampugnani: Born in Rome in 1951. Studied architecture in Rome and in Stuttgart; in 1977 doctorate. 1974-80 scientific assistant at Stuttgart University. 1980-84 consultant to the International Building Exhibition Berlin (IBA) for the new construction areas. 1990-94 Director of the German Architecture Museum. 1991-95 editor of Domus. Since 1994 professor for the History of urban design at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich; since 2010 Dean of the Institute of History and Theory of Architecture (gta). Since 1980 own architectural practice, in Berlin and then in Milan. Among his most important projects: office building in Block 109, Berlin (1991-1996); housing group in Maria Lankowitz near Graz (1995-1999); entrance square of the Audi factory in Ingolstadt (1999-2000); urban design planning of Novartis Campus in St.Johann, Basel, (2001 ff.); underground station Mergellina, Naples (2004-2011); reshaping of the Donau banks, Regensburg (2004ff), with Wolfgang Weinzierl and others; master plan Richti Quartier, Wallisellen, as well as planning of the open spaces and of a residential block with shops (2007-2013). Numerous scholarly architectural publications and exhibitions, among others: Architecture and city planning in the 20th century, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1985; Encyclopaedia of 20th century architecture, Harry N. Abrams, New York 1986; Museum Architecture in Frankfurt 1980-1990, Prestel, Munich 1990; Museums for a New Millenium. Concepts, Projects, Buildings (with Angeli Sachs, Prestel, 1999); Novartis Campus. A Contemporary Work Environment. Premises, Elements, Perspectives, (Hatje Cantz Verlag, Ostfildern, 2009); "Stadtbau als Handwerk/Urban Design as Craft", (gta Verlag, 2011).
Views: 1149 AA School of Architecture
In his 2017 Robbins Lectures, Professor Jeffrey D. Sachs will argue for a new Moral Economics built firmly on the foundations of the new moral sciences. The goal of moral economics is to promote wellbeing. A core principle is the cultivation of individual and group virtue to help guide the behavior of both individuals and groups in the global society. Lecture 2. The Hard Problem of Inter-Group Morality The most difficult moral challenges involve the interaction across groups, whether nation states, private companies, or ethnic groups. In all such cases, there is the deep tendency towards inter-group conflict. The cultivation of group virtue to underpin inter-group peace and cooperation is an especially daunting challenge. The two other lectures that are part of this series are on Monday 13 and Wednesday 15 February. Jeffrey D Sachs (@JeffDSachs) is Professor of Economics at Columbia University, a leader in sustainable development, senior UN advisor, bestselling author and syndicated columnist. Richard Layard is Director for the Wellbeing Programme, Centre for Economic Performance. The CEP (@CEP_LSE) is an interdisciplinary research centre at the LSE Research Laboratory. It was established by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) in 1990 and is now one of the leading economic research groups in Europe.
The New Putney Debates 2014 (Occupy London initiative) Is Capitalism Part of the Answer? Ann Pettifor is a Director of Policy Research in Macroeconomics (PRIME), Honorary Research Fellow at the Political Economy Research Centre at City University (CITYPERC) and a fellow of the New Economics Foundation, London. The Debate is facilitated or chaired by Amrita Bhohi, Proposing the motion is Mark Goyder, founder director of Tomorrows’ Company, the City’s leading think-tank. He is opposed by Professor David Graeber of LSE. The motion is seconded by Dr Dave Dewhurst, of Occupy London, (emphatically speaking in his own capacity). The concluding argument for the case against capitalism will be Dr Ann Pettifor of PRIME Speakers biographies: Mark Goyder Mark Goyder is an award-winning speaker, writer and broadcaster with over 15 years’ experience as a manager in manufacturing businesses. He is Founder Director of Tomorrow’s Company (www.tomorrowscompany.com) a London-based globally focused agenda-setting think tank that works with business leaders and investors to shape the future of business success. Tomorrow’s Company developed the concept of the business licence to operate and redefined the concept of corporate social responsibility in the 1990s. Its original report laid the foundations for the extension of the duties of directors in the 2006 Companies Act, and its 2008 report ‘Tomorrow’s Owners’ paved the way for the development of the world’s first investor Stewardship Code. Its report ‘Restoring Trust – financial services in the 21st Century (2004) stimulated the emergence of the UN Principles of Responsible Investment, Mark has current advisory roles with Alliance Boots and Camelot, and has previously worked in such roles with directors of BA, BT, Novo Nordisk. The latest edition of his book ‘Living Tomorrow’s Company – rediscovering the Human Purposes of Business’ was published in India in 2013 and described by Charles Handy as ‘by far the best, and most readable, account of capitalism’s current discontents’ . Reviewing the book, Farrokh K. Kavarana, Director, Tata Sons said “Living Tomorrow’s Company is a remarkable and learned tome which is bound to become a standard text book in the MBA programmes of enlightened business schools around the world and a “must read” for all businessmen who wish to be successful the “right way”. Dave Dewhurst Founder member of Occupy London’s Economics Working Group & involved in a range of public speaking & writing as a result. He is currently co-operating with the Jubilee Debt Campaign to establish a UK+ Debt Audit. David is Secretary of the Cybernetics Society and has a PhD in Cybernetics (common properties of large complex systems) A former Headteacher, Lead Ofsted Inspector, management consultant and Tesco’s floor cleaner. After A-level economics he was offered a job in a Manchester merchant bank, and demonstrated an early understanding of the financial system by rejecting it. Ann Pettifor Ann Pettifor is a Director of Policy Research in Macroeconomics (PRIME), Honorary Research Fellow at the Political Economy Research Centre at City University (CITYPERC) and a fellow of the New Economics Foundation, London. She is best known for correctly predicting the Global Financial Crises in several publications including "Coming soon: The new poor” and her 2006 publication "The coming first world debt crises" (Palgrave Macmillan). Pettifor's background is in sovereign debt. She was one of the leaders in the Jubilee 2000 debt campaign which succeeded in writing off $100 billion of debts (in nominal terms) owed by 35 of the poorest countries. She is also Executive Director of a consultancy Advocacy International, which undertakes advises governments and organisations on matters relating to international finance and sustainable development. Ann Pettifor's recently published: Just Money: How Society Can Break the Despotic Power of Finance (Commonwealth Publishing 2014). David Graeber David Rolfe Graeber (/ˈɡreɪbər/; born 12 February 1961) is an American anthropologist, author, anarchist and activist who is currently Professor of Anthropology at the London School of Economics. Specialising in theories of value and social theory, he was an assistant professor and associate professor of anthropology at Yale University from 1998 to 2007, although Yale controversially declined to rehire him. From Yale, he went on to become a Reader in Social Anthropology at Goldsmiths, University of London from Fall 2007 to Summer 2013. Graeber has been involved in social and political activism, including the protests against the 3rd Summit of the Americas in Quebec City in 2001 and the World Economic Forum in New York City in 2002. He is also a leading figure in the Occupy Wall Street movement. David Graeber speaks
Views: 1834 Occupy UK
Philosophies of science and social science part 4 Feminist methodology and epistemology, quantitative and qualitative research This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Qualitative Political Analysis https://www.academia.edu/3510023/Philosophy_of_social_science_pt_1_ Course Aims and Objectives https://www.dropbox.com/s/c6rzr7dpzk64sbb/How%20to%20social%20science%20101.docx?dl=0 PDF download of An introduction to feminist research Jane Wambui (2013) file:///C:/Users/drkmw/Downloads/Wambui%20Introduction%20to%20feminist%20research%202013.pdf Feminist Methodology and Epistemology Andrea Doucet and Nathasha S. Mauthner http://www.andreadoucet.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Doucet-Mauthner-2005-Feminist-Methodologies-and-Epistemologies.pdf Discussion question: What is the difference between quantitative and qualitative research? Can they be reconciled? *King, G., Keohane, R. & Verba, S. (1995). Designing Social Inquiry. NJ: Princeton University Press. *Two articles from Review Symposium: The Qualitative-Quantitative Disputation. (1995). American Political Science Review. Vol 89, pp. 454-481. Or *Chapters 10-13 of Brady, H. & Collier, D. (2004). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc. Bryman, A. (2001) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapters 21 and 22. Punch, K. (1998). Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage. Van Meter, K. (1994). Sociological Methodology. International Social Sciences Journal. Vol 46, no 1, pp. 15-25. Ragin, C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. Brannen, J. (1992). Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Aldershot: Avebury. Glassner, B. & Moreno, J. (1989). The Qualitative-Quantitative Distinction in the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel. Kritzer, H. (1996). The Data Puzzle: The Nature of Interpretation in Quantitative Research. American Journal of Political Science. Vol 40, no 1, pp. 1-32. Dex, S. (1991). Life and Work History Analyses: Qualitative and Quantitative Developments. London: Routledge. Gephart, R. (1988). Ethnostatistics: Qualitative Foundations for Quantitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage. Deacon, D. Collision or collusion? a discussion and case study of the unplanned triangulation of quantitative and qualitative research methods. *Marsh, D and Furlong, P. A Skin not a sweater: ontology and epistemology in political science. In Stoker, G and Marsh, D (eds.) (2002). Theory and Method in Political Science. London: Palgrave. *Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative Researching. London Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage. Chapter 1. Cohen, R and Wartofsky, M. (eds.)(1983). Epistemology, methodology and the social sciences. Dordrecht, Holland Boston : D. Reidel Pub. Co Stanley, L. (ed.)(1990). Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London New York: Routledge. The interpretive approach in political science: a symposium. BJPIR vol 6, No 2. 129-164. Hartsock, N ‘The feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism’ in Harding and Hintikka (1983) (eds) Discovering Reality, Reidel Harding, N. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women’s Lives. Cornel University Press. My subscribers are awesome - you're awesome too so you should subscribe as well! Join my monthly seminar by supporting me on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/drkmwinters My YouTube Facebook page Kristi Winters https://www.facebook.com/youtubedrkmwinters/ Follow me on Twitter too! https://twitter.com/KWintie
Views: 424 Kristi Winters
The Sol Price Center for Social Innovation develops ideas and social entrepreneurs who will improve the quality of life for people in low-income, urban communities across the globe. Helmut Anheier raises important, emerging issues for research and policy in the field of social innovation. Join us to discuss the implications of his research as it pertains to government, philanthropy, and non-profit sectors. Bio: Helmut K. Anheier, PhD, is Professor of Sociology and President and Dean at the Hertie School of Governance. He also holds a chair of Sociology at Heidelberg University and serves as Academic Director of the Center for Social Investment. He received his PhD from Yale University in 1986. During the 1990s, he was a senior researcher at John Hopkins School of Public Policy. From 2001 to 2009, he was Professor of Public Policy and Social Welfare at UCLA's Luskin School of Public Affairs, and Centennial Professor at the London School of Economics. Professor Anheier founded and directed the Centre for Civil Society at LSE and the Center for Civil Society at UCLA. Before embarking on an academic career, he served as social affairs officer to the United Nations. He is author of over 400 publications, and won various international prizes and recognitions for his scholarship. Amongst his recent book publications are Nonprofit Organizations - Theory, Management, Policy (London: Routledge, 2014), A Versatile American Institution: The Changing Ideals and Realities of Philanthropic Foundations with David Hammack (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2013) and The Global Studies Encyclopedia with Mark Juergensmeyer (5 vols, Sage, 2012). He is the principal academic lead of the Hertie School’s annual Governance Report (Oxford University Press, 2013 – current), and currently working on projects relating to indicator research, social innovation, and success and failure in philanthropy.
Views: 540 USC Price
Documentary on the Abuses of the Indian Boarding Schools. Discusses the intergenerational trauma in native communities. The "Wellbriety Movement: Journey of Forgiveness" is now available on Youtube, www.whitebison.org , or free on DVD. Email [email protected] for DVD, include mailing address.
Views: 106863 Don Coyhis
The second of three girls, Dr. Welsing was born on March 18, 1935, in Chicago, Illinois, into a family that had already produced two doctors. Her father, Henry N. Cress, was a medical doctor, as was her grandfather. After receiving her bachelor’s degree at Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio, in 1957, and her M.D. at Howard University College of Medicine five years later, Welsing pursued a career in general and child psychiatry. She is renowned for her Cress Theory essay which was published while she was an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Howard University College of Medicine. According to Welsing, it caused such a stir that her tenure at the university was not renewed in 1975. For Welsing, the world’s most pressing problem is the disturbing issue of white supremacy, or racism: “I put the discussion of melanin on the board in order to describe how pigmentation was a factor in what white supremacy behavior was all about,” Welsing noted in an interview with Michael Eric Dyson for Emerge. “If I had my way, there wouldn’t be all the discussion about melanin. I would say, “discuss white supremacy.” Welsing laid the foundation for her ongoing discussion of white supremacy in her groundbreaking 1970 essay, The Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation and Racism. In it, she reasoned that because whiteness is a color deficiency and white people make up only a small percentage of the earth’s population, they tend to view people of color as a threat to their survival and therefore, treat them with hostility. She stated that their defensive reaction has been to impose white supremacy, or racism, on people of color throughout history. Dr. Welsing concluded her Cress Theory of Color-Confrontation by arguing that people of color must gain a better understanding of the “behavioral maneuverings” of whites in order to avoid being “manipulated into a subordinated position.” In her view, people of color need to “liberate” themselves psychologically from various forms of white domination. She also suggested that whites need to understand the motivation behind their behavior and explore with an open mind the emotional and psychological foundations of racism. The issue of white supremacy is discussed in depth in Welsing’s 1990 book The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors, a virtual fixture on the Blackboard African American Bestsellers List. Not surprisingly, Dr. Welsing’s views about global white supremacy and racism in contemporary society have provoked controversy and stimulated debate in and outside of the Black community, as well as on national television. Her theory has also challenged former definitions of racism put forth by social and behavioral scientists. Despite the controversy surrounding her, Welsing was praised in the Los Angeles Times for being “the first scientist to psychoanalyze white racism” in the history of Western psychiatry, rather then focusing on the victims of racism. She is sought out by the media for her provocative view of race relations and lectures about racism at colleges and universities in the U.S. and England. Dr. Welsing suggested in The Washington Post that more attention should be paid to “what is happening to Black men, a large segment of whom are in a state of frustration and hopelessness.” Welsing also suggests that African American families must operate more effectively if they are to produce “strong-minded” children who can “challenge” white supremacy. In an interview in Essence magazine, she said “No Black female should have children before the age of 30, and no Black man should become a father before the age of 35. Before child rearing, we should be going to school, going to the library, educating ourselves. We must create mature, mentally developed parents. Then we will be able to produce children with self-respect and a high-level functioning pattern.” Ultimately Welsing believes that the key to eradicating racism lies in self-respect, discipline, and education. “We must clean up our neighborhoods… we must revolutionize ourselves…. Whether white people are consciously or subconsciously aware of it, they are behaving in a manner to ensure white genetic survival. We must know this truth. And the truth is the first step toward real strength.”
Views: 1094 MADGUNS FOREVER™
RenegadeInc.com brings you FOUR HORSEMEN - an award winning independent feature documentary which lifts the lid on how the world really works. As we will never return to 'business as usual' 23 international thinkers, government advisors and Wall Street money-men break their silence and explain how to establish a moral and just society. FOUR HORSEMEN is free from mainstream media propaganda -- the film doesn't bash bankers, criticise politicians or get involved in conspiracy theories. It ignites the debate about how to usher a new economic paradigm into the world which would dramatically improve the quality of life for billions. Subtitles available in English, French, Greek, Spanish and Portuguese. "It's Inside Job with bells on, and a frequently compelling thesis thanks to Ashcroft's crack team of talking heads -- economists, whistleblowers and Noam Chomsky, all talking with candour and clarity." - Total Film "Four Horsemen is a breathtakingly composed jeremiad against the folly of Neo-classical economics and the threats it represents to all we should hold dear." - Harold Crooks, The Corporation (Co-Director) Surviving Progress (Co-Director/Co-Writer) Follow us on https://www.twitter.com/Renegade_Inc on https://www.facebook.com/RenEconomist or visit our website http://www.renegadeinc.com Support us by subscribing here http://bit.ly/1db4xVQ
Views: 8265310 Renegade Inc.
IPNB combines neuroscience, psychology, complexity theory, environmental influences, and relationship studies. Developed by Dr. Dan Siegel, Dr. Allan Schore and Dr. Lou Cozolino in the late 1990s, Interpersonal Neurobiology seeks the similar patterns that arise from separate science fields and approaches to knowledge. Interpersonal Neurobiology illuminates how the mind and brain develop across the lifespan. It has profound applications for healthcare, education, leadership, parenting, organizational development, and more. For more information visit: http://climb.pcc.edu/ipnb --------------------- CLIMB delivers professional training and business development, backed by the experience and size of Portland Community College. Wherever you are in your career or business, CLIMB can help you take the next step up. CLIMB is home to: Institute for Health Professionals, Small Business Development Center, Professional Development & Training, and Life By Design NW.
Views: 551 PCC Videos
An adherent to Watson's theory of behaviorism, B.F. Skinner was able to demonstrate how one can modify behavior through a process he called "shaping." In contrast to pure classical conditioning, Skinner utilized positive and negative reinforcement to cause behavior. Utilizing a contraption that became known as "Skinner's Box" he demonstrated how he could shape the behavior of pigeons by reinforcing their behavior. "By discovering the causes of behavior we can dispose of the imagined internal cause." - B.F. Skinner.
Views: 197246 globalbeehive
Part of a television series 'Strangers Abroad', shown on television in the 1990s. Details of the programme, including producer, director and other credits are at the end of the film. The film centres on the work of E.E.Evans-Pritchard, particularly his work on Azande Witchcraft. For interviews with other anthropologists and further materials, please see www.alanmacfarlane.com All revenues donated to World Oral Literature Project
Views: 3292 Prof Alan Macfarlane - Ayabaya
Filled with interviews and interesting facts from indigenous peoples and scientists from Canada and around the world, fresh footage and new perspectives, this documentary offers a unique insight into the current conditions of water quality in Canada’s First Nations Communities. Some of these results are surprising and some are shocking and it is our hope that this documentary will engage, but more importantly, inform viewers. The Producer and Director is Dr Jeffrey Reading, (Mohawk Tyendinaga), and the Associate Producers are Robynne Edgar, (Metis Ancestry from Batoche) and Karen Davies (Cedarwood Productions).
Views: 5105 cedarwoodproductions
Discussions by four Cree elders; George Brertton, Fred Campiou, Isaac Chamakese and William Dreaver, give insight into the differences between Canadian law and Cree Natural Law and why Natural Law is needed in contemporary society. Wahkohtowin means "everything is related." It is one of the basic principles of Cree Natural Law passed through language, song, prayer, and storytelling. The elders explain that by following the teachings of Wahkohtowin individuals, communities and societies are healthier.
Views: 32803 BearPaw Legal
What is DIALOGICAL SELF? What does DIALOGICAL SELF mean? DIALOGICAL SELF meaning & explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. The dialogical self is a psychological concept which describes the mind's ability to imagine the different positions of participants in an internal dialogue, in close connection with external dialogue. The "dialogical self" is the central concept in the Dialogical Self Theory (DST), as created and developed by the Dutch psychologist Hubert Hermans since the 1990s. Dialogical Self Theory (DST) weaves two concepts, self and dialogue, together in such a way that a more profound understanding of the interconnection of self and society is achieved. Usually, the concept of self refers to something “internal,” something that takes place within the mind of the individual person, while dialogue is typically associated with something “external,” that is, processes that take place between people involved in communication. The composite concept “dialogical self” goes beyond the self-other dichotomy by infusing the external to the internal and, in reverse, to introduce the internal into the external. As functioning as a “society of mind”, the self is populated by a multiplicity of “self-positions” that have the possibility to entertain dialogical relationships with each other. In Dialogical Self Theory (DST) the self is considered as “extended,” that is, individuals and groups in the society at large are incorporated as positions in the mini-society of the self. As a result of this extension, the self does not only include internal positions (e.g., I as the son of my mother, I as a teacher, I as a lover of jazz), but also external positions (e.g., my father, my pupils, the groups to which I belong). Given the basic assumption of the extended self, the other is not simply outside the self but rather an intrinsic part of it. There is not only the actual other outside the self, but also the imagined other who is entrenched as the other-in-the-self. An important theoretical implication is that basic processes, like self-conflicts, self-criticism, self-agreements, and self-consultancy, are taking place in different domains in the self: within the internal domain (e.g., “As an enjoyer of life I disagree with myself as an ambitious worker”); between the internal and external (extended) domain (e.g., “I want to do this but the voice of my mother in myself criticizes me”) and within the external domain (e.g., “The way my colleagues interact with each other has led me to decide for another job”). As these examples show, there is not always a sharp separation between the inside of the self and the outside world, but rather a gradual transition. DST assumes that the self as a society of mind is populated by internal and external self-positions. When some positions in the self silence or suppress other positions, monological relationships prevail. When, in contrast, positions are recognized and accepted in their differences and alterity (both within and between the internal and external domains of the self), dialogical relationships emerge with the possibility to further develop and renew the self and the other as central parts of the society at large.
Views: 1548 The Audiopedia
September 25, 2013 - How has Eurocentric anthropology and linguistics affected the way we interpret our elders and ancestors who share their cultural knowledge with foreign researchers? Join us for a presentation with Khelsilem Rivers and April Charlo, indigenous peoples from community-based and cultural revitalization backgrounds, who will be discussing decolonization of language revitalization. Their presentation and open dialogue will address the context of rapid language loss and decline, and how colonization has affected or is embedded in the strategies of revitalization. In an effort to revitalize Indigenous languages, communities may have unknowingly adopted or assimilated colonized ways of thinking as they invest interest and attempt to repair or restore ties to culture and language. Are we learning to speak Sḵwx̱wú7mesh, Nēhiyawēwin, Kanien'kéha, et all with an English-mind or are we learning to speak Sḵwx̱wú7mesh, Nēhiyawēwin, Kanien'kéha with a Sḵwx̱wú7mesh, Nēhiyaw, Kanien'keháka mind? Indigenous languages represent one of the darkest ways in which ethnocide and cultural genocide have occurred. It is expected in the next twenty-five years over 700 of the worlds Indigenous languages will be forgotten. In the Vancouver area alone, the two Indigenous languages are considered critical endangered; Sḵwx̱wú7mesh (Squamish) language has five to seven fluent speakers and hən̓q̓əmin̓əm has one fluent speaker left. Decolonizing Language Revitalization aims to put forward perspectives of shifting values, cultural understandings, and impacts on community. It is the stories we tell ourselves (as a people) that impacts who we believe we are, and then who we become. But if the stories -- even including, or especially the Indigenous ones -- are filtered through colonialism, we have become a different people because of it. April Charlo from Bitterroot Salish people and is a member of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Montana. Khelsilem Rivers is a Sḵwx̱wú7mesh-Kwakwa̱ka̱'wakw language revitalization activist from Vancouver. Supported by SFU's Vancity Office of Community Engagement http://sfuwoodwards.ca/index.php/community
Views: 8953 Simon Fraser University
Part 2: "Secrets of the control of humanity.' "In the early 1990s many theories flourished explaining why the West is so keen to destroy Russia. The most popular among them was the Public Security Concept “Mertvaya voda” (Dead Water - in Russian mythology the Dead water may revive dead and cure wounds) which convinced many otherwise sensible people’s eyes to the role of Judeo-Christianity in both destroying the human psyche and also in shaping a slavish mentality. This Concept, created by General Konstantin Petrov, argues that all Russia’s woes began with the adoption of Christianity (specifically, "Judaic Christianity"), imposed by the Jews. In the 1990s the Concept leaflets were disseminated in underground, self-published brochures, but by the 2000s its adherents were found in the Russian secret services and government bodies. “Taking a realistic view of the current sweeping expansion of the Satanic Global Predictor and its secret-agent network, it cannot be ruled out that a path to a future Planetary Bio-Defense Union lies through an accelerated creation of a Pan-Eurasian Defense Union as a geopolitical alternative to the ongoing expansion of the United States and NATO” - it is a characteristic quote from the Concept, which was discovered by the authors of this book in the draft memo, “Global processes: trends of developments in the world and Russia until 2020” prepared by the Systems Analysis Research Institute, a think tank under the Russian Audit Chamber, headed by Sergei Stepashin, chief of the FSB from 1994-1995. Nor was the Audit Chamber the only Russian government body infiltrated by the ideas of the “Dead water concept”. The official website of Concept's followers www.kpe.ru stated that the FSB had always supported the Concept." Series of lectures includes the presentation of the modern language of ancient philosophical and philosophical positions, hidden from mankind, and compare them with the existing ones. Exposed the false concepts and ideas, justified and proved true. From this perspective, the analysis of the history of mankind as a process managed and Russia's role in this process. Disclose the origin of mankind, its history and purpose of its existence. Details are bases of management of public processes at both the regional and global levels of government. The analysis of various faiths, religious cults and secular ideologies (including Freemasonry) in the management of social systems and processes . A detailed explanation of the mechanism of action and the noosphere egregors on people's lives and the course of social processes, describes the role of the mind in the heads of government. It is enough to detail the foundations of economic management and role in the global credit and financial system based on usury. Opened mechanisms cheating people settle just how to manage the economy. Finally, new information reveals the state of humanity, is a description of the current situation in the world and in Russia. The principles of equitable living arrangement and clearly formulated ways and means of its establishment. The course video lectures designed primarily for students of all profiles (as it affects the situation in all spheres of life), and will be a great help in writing term papers and dissertations. It will be useful to high school students thinking, seeking to obtain advanced knowledge that will be needed later in life, including in higher education. The course is a must faculty universities, colleges and teachers of secondary and special schools and more because those to whom they provide knowledge, very soon will ask questions to their teachers on issues of this video course.
Views: 7853 Tony Topping The World of UFOs
NORBERT ELIAS (1897-1990) The civilizing process, The rise of manners, Norbert Elias
Views: 1351 Felsefe & Tasavvuf
Moral Disengagement addresses how otherwise good people can do cruel things. They do so through selective disengagement of moral self-sanctions from inhumane conduct. At the behavior locus, worthy ends are used to sanctify harmful means by social and moral justification. At the agency locus, people obscure personal responsibility by displacement and diffusion of responsibility. At the outcomes locus, the detrimental social effects of one's actions are ignored, minimized, or disrupted. At the victim locus, perpetrators dehumanize and blame recipients for bringing the maltreatment on themselves. These mechanisms operate at both individual and social systems levels. Disengagement of moral agency is illustrated in the workings of the corporate world, terrorism, the use of military force, application of the death penalty, and in ecological destruction that is heating the planet and making it less habitable.
Views: 53564 Jeffrey Zeig
Few legal scholars have blown as many minds and had the tangible impact that Richard Epstein has managed. His 1985 volume, Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain is a case in point. Epstein made the hugely controversial argument that regulations and other government actions such as environmental regulations that substantially limit the use of or decrease the value of property should be thought of as a form of eminent domain and thus strictly limited by the Constitution. The immediate result was a firestorm of outrage followed by an acknowledgment that the guy was onto something. As Epstein told Reason in a 1995 interview, "I took some pride in the fact that [Sen.] Joe Biden (D-Del.) held a copy of Takings up to a hapless Clarence Thomas back in 1991 and said that anyone who believes what's in this book is certifiably unqualified to sit in on the Supreme Court. That's a compliment of sorts.... But I took even more pride in the fact that, during the Breyer hearings [in 199X], there were no such theatrics, even as the nominee was constantly questioned on whether he agreed with the Epstein position on deregulation as if that position could not be held by responsible people." Born in New York in 1943, Epstein splits faculty appointments at the University of Chicago and New York University; he's also a senior fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, and a contributor to Reason. In books such as Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws (1992) to Simple Rules for a Complex World (1995), and Skepticism and Freedom: A Modern Case for Classical Liberalism (2003), Epstein pushes his ideas and preconceptions to their limits and takes his readers along for the ride. A die-hard libertarian who believes the state should be limited and individual freedom expanded, he is nonetheless the consummate intellectual who first and foremost demands he offer up ironclad proofs for his characteristically counterintuitive insights into law and social theory. Indeed, Epstein's enduring value may not be any particular legal or policy prescription he's offered over the years but rather his methodology. He believes in robust and unfettered argument and debate as a way of gaining knowledge. If you don't put your ideas out in the arena, you can't be doing your best work, he argues. "The problem when you keep to yourself is you don't get to hear strong ideas articulated by people who disagree with you," he says. Reason's Nick Gillespie interviewed Epstein at NYU's law building in October. The conversation was wide-ranging and high-energy--another Epsteinian virtue. They talked about legal challenges to ObamaCare, the effects of stimulus spending and TARP bailouts, and a former University of Chicago adjunct faculty member by the name of Barack Obama, with whom Epstein regularly interacted in the 1990s and early 2000s. "He passed through Chicago without absorbing much of the internal culture," says Epstein of the president. "He's amazingly good at playing intellectual poker. But that's a disadvantage, because if you don't put your ideas out there to be shot down, you're never gonna figure out what kind of revision you want." Filmed and edited by Jim Epstein with help from Michael C. Moynihan and Josh Swain. Approximately 12.30 minutes. Go to Reason.tv for HD, iPod, and audio versions of this and all our videos and subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel to receive automatic notification when new content is posted.
Views: 81391 ReasonTV
#SurvivorStories May all who seek the truth find it. Our Essence can only be felt and understood on a level without symbols. Symbols may be open to error, speculation, misinterpretation, doubt, and confusion. After a long time, you may have an insight, an “Oh I see!” moment, when everything falls into place and we get that. Without words. Hopefully, this message may help you to find that part of yourself, the essence, that has always been there, and you know it, but you’ve forgotten to pay attention for a long time. References: Cicourel, A. (1990). "The integration of distributed knowledge in collaborative medical diagnosis", in: Intellectual teamwork. social and technological foundations of cooperative work, edited by J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut and C. Egido, pp. 221-242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Drucker, P. (1992) "The new society of organisations." Harvard Business Review, 70 (Sept-Oct), 95-104 Finerty, T. (1997). "Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure." Journal of Knowledge Management. 1(2), 98-104 Glazer, R. (1998). "Measuring the knower: towards a theory of knowledge equity." California Management Review, 40(3), 175-194 Goguen J. A. (1997) "Toward a social, ethical theory of information," in: Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: beyond the great divide," edited by G.C. Bowker, Susan, L. Star, W. Turner and L. Gasser, pp.27-56. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hildreth, P., Wright, P. & Kimble, C. (1999). "Knowledge management: are we missing something?" in: 4th UKAIS Conference, York, UK pp347-356. London: McGraw Hill. Junnarkar, B. & Brown, C. (1997). "Re-assessing the enabling role of information technology in KM." Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 142-148 Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ruggles, R. (1998) "The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice." California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89 Star, S.L. (1989). "The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving." Distributed Artificial Intelligence, 2, 37-54 Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Help Support the Channel via Patreon – Thank You https://www.patreon.com/Wakeman Help Support the Channel via PayPal – Thank You https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=66BDSAWPTBLUJ DISCLOSURE: The videos’ contents of this channel are a "one man's opinion." The author of this video is in no way offering professional advice or counseling services. Please contact your local authorities if you feel you are in danger. Anything that is said on the videos is opinion, criticism, information or commentary. When making any type of therapeutic decision, it would be wise to contact or consult a professional before making that decision. Due to the nature of this channel’s content, the author prefers to remain anonymous.
Views: 4120 Wakeman
Professor Munger received his Ph.D. in Economics at Washington University in St. Louis in 1984. Following his graduate training, he worked as a staff economist at the Federal Trade Commission. His first teaching job was in the Economics Department at Dartmouth College, followed by appointments in the Political Science Department at the University of Texas at Austin (1986-1990) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1990-1997). At UNC he directed the MPA Program, which trains public service professionals, especially city and county management. He moved to Duke in 1997, and was Chair of the Political Science Department from 2000 through 2010. He has won three University-wide teaching awards (the Howard Johnson Award, an NAACP "Image" Award for teaching about race, and admission to the Bass Society of Teaching Fellows). He is currently director of the interdisciplinary PPE Program at Duke University. Munger’s recent books include “Choosing in Groups” (coauthored with his son, Kevin Munger) and “The Thing Itself,” both in 2015. His research interests include the study of the morality of exchange and the working of the new “Middleman Economy.” Much of his recent work has been in philosophy, examining the concept of truly voluntary exchange, a concept for which he coined the term "euvoluntary." His current project is a book entitled “Tomorrow 3.0." Subscribe to our YouTube Channel for more! Follow us at https://twitter.com/dukepolisci Like us at https://facebook.com/dukepolisci Follow us at https://instagram.com/dukepolisci Produced by Shaun King, Duke University Department of Political Science Communications Specialist
Views: 2057 Duke University Department of Political Science