Search results “Research articles on evaluations”
How to Write a Critique Essay (An Evaluation Essay_
Defines the five common parts of a critique essay and provides a formula for completing each part.
Views: 302964 David Taylor
Evaluating Sources
A tutorial describing how to evaluate sources. Brought to you by Western Libraries. Please contact Research Help http://www.lib.uwo.ca/services/research.html for more assistance. Email [email protected] or Comment with questions or suggestions on more Videos & How-Tos Evaluating Sources by Western Libraries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Views: 271046 Western University
how to write evaluation report - how to write a good evaluation
How to write evaluation report. Writing an evaluation report is an essential component when it comes to M&E reporting. How to write a good evaluation? Writing a report is a skill that requires that report findings are communicated in a concise manner. At whatever point making and creating an evaluation report, endeavor to address the going with issues, as proposed by A Thompson (2005), Guide to business report forming, open at bestentrepreneur.murdoch.edu.au/Guide_To_Report_Writing.pdfexternal associate. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/4cmas/tipsevalreports.htm YouTube Channel; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxxZ... Google Plus; https://plus.google.com/u/0/100637621... Twitter; https://twitter.com/manuscriptceo Facebook; https://web.facebook.com/profile.php?... YouTube Video; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHSmb0RnwsM Choose the degree of the report: Be clear about the purpose behind the report and recollect this when gathering information and reporting revelations and proposition. Consider the expected intrigue amass, its needs and essential administration frames while choosing the report's style and course of action including: gathering of spectators demographics, for instance, age, associations, perspectives, et cetera. preparing level, especially as to experience and learning of NRM obligation with respect to fundamental authority level of detail required and establishment required level of specific lingo and need to portray terms, perhaps in a glossary directions to help understanding by using visual aides. Gather and organize information by giving: establishment information with targets, expand plans, wander organizes, methodology environment, et cetera. Report mastermind must reflect the reason, social event of individuals, kind of information being represented and fancied result. Ensure information is passed on accurately and impartially. Presentation quality will affect the impression of information quality, so ensure the report is exact, smaller and that emphasis and semantic utilize push proposed meaning. Use an evidentiary approach which demonstrates the relationship between the substances and the recommendations and as needs be grants confide in accomplices and gatherings of spectators. how to write evaluation report| how to write a good evaluation| how to write summary report| what to include in an evaluation| example of evaluation report| how to write an evaluation report| project evaluation report| how to write a summary of findings| program evaluation sample report| evaluation how to write| evaluation report sample template| evaluative writing examples| what is an evaluative summary| how to write a final report|sample writing evaluation report format| how to make an evaluation| how do you do an evaluation| project evaluation report example| how to write an effective evaluation| how to do a good evaluation|how to write a programme evaluation report| how to evaluate a report| how to make evaluation report| what makes a good evaluation| how to write a program evaluation| what is evaluation report| how to write evaluation questions| how to do an evaluation report| what is evaluation in writing| how to write evaluation paper| what should an evaluation include| what is a evaluation report| how to write monitoring report| evaluation report| what to include in evaluation|
Views: 8905 M&E Made Simple
Learn How to Improve UX with Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics
Support Me! Check Out My Design Resources: http://bit.ly/1QniFxp Get 6 Free Design Fonts, Templates, & More Each Week!: http://bit.ly/2PSCYd6 Design Books and Tech Recommendations: https://amzn.to/2ND39CT *Creative Market and Amazon links above are referral links to support this channel. :) Link to the Nielsen Normal Groups article (published in 1995!): https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ Excellent UX design is much easier said than done. We can always do our best to do what is right for the people using our designs, but it's very easy to forget some of the most basic things when you don't have a list to double check. That's where Jakob Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics are an excellent resource. Each one of these 10 heuristics serves as a checklist item to ensure that you're doing the right things to make for the best user experience possible. I'll talk over each one of these 10 items breaking down what the descriptions mean, and also showing some real world examples of them in use. Hopefully you find it helpful, and as always, I look forward to seeing your thoughts around the subject in the comments section. :) Personal Website / Store: http://www.mattborchert.com #design #ux #usability
Views: 2682 Matt Borchert
Evaluation of medical lecture class - Video abstract [78441]
Video abstract of original research paper "Evaluation of doctors’ performance as facilitators in basic medical science lecture classes in a new Malaysian medical school" published in the open access journal Advances in Medical Education and Practice by Salwani Binti Ismail, Abdus Salam, Ahmed G Alattraqchi, et al. Background: Didactic lecture is the oldest and most commonly used method of teaching. In addition, it is considered one of the most efficient ways to disseminate theories, ideas, and facts. Many critics feel that lectures are an obsolete method to use when students need to perform hands-on activities, which is an everyday need in the study of medicine. This study evaluates students' perceptions regarding lecture quality in a new medical school. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted of the medical students of Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin. The study population was 468 preclinical medical students from years 1 and 2 of academic year 2012–2013. Data were collected using a validated instrument. There were six different sections of questions using a 5-point Likert scale. The data were then compiled and analyzed, using SPSS version 20. Results: The response rate was 73%. Among 341 respondents, 30% were male and 70% were female. Eighty-five percent of respondents agree or strongly agree that the lectures had met the criteria with regard to organization of lecture materials. Similarly, 97% of students agree or strongly agree that lecturers maintained adequate voices and gestures. Conclusion: Medical students are quite satisfied with the lecture classes and the lectures. However, further research is required to identify student-centered teaching and learning methods to promote active learning. See the full paper here: http://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-doctors39-performance-as-facilitators-in-basic-medical-s-peer-reviewed-article-AMEP
Views: 178 Dove Medical Press
Scientific Writing Assistant (SWAN) video tutorial: Part 3 - Using SWAN, Full evaluation
Scientific Writing Assistant (SWAN) video tutorial by Jean-Luc Lebrun Part 3: How to start using SWAN? Jean-Luc Lebrun shows second of the possible ways to use SWAN: the Full evaluation mode. Full evaluation allows you to make evaluations with the standard part of your paper (title, abstract, introduction, conclusions) as well as with your structure! In full evaluation mode, you will import your whole paper into SWAN, and with the semiautomatic import process, determine the structure of your paper. You may also have your text fluidity evaluated by using either automatic or manual text progression assesment tool! Video from Scientific Writing 2.0 A Reader and Writer's Guide by Jean-Luc Lebrun http://www.scientific-writing.com/ http://cs.uef.fi/swan/
Views: 3172 ScienceSwan
Article Evaluation
Produced for MSE6550 Sport Psychology, Article Evaluations.
Views: 15 Nicholas Patenaude
Data Collection & Analysis
Impact evaluations need to go beyond assessing the size of the effects (i.e., the average impact) to identify for whom and in what ways a programme or policy has been successful. This video provides an overview of the issues involved in choosing and using data collection and analysis methods for impact evaluations
Views: 56457 UNICEF Innocenti
Critical Appraisal of the Nursing Literature
Learn the basics of critically appraising nursing literature in this video. This was created for the Idaho State University Nursing course, 'NURS 6610, Advanced Evidence Applications'
Views: 6128 ISU Libraries
monitoring and evaluation interview questions - m&e interview questions
monitoring and evaluation interview questions are usually no different from any common interview. Talking is for the most part a vital part of the interview process in almost toward looking for some kind of employment. It's a crucial that in answering M&E interview questions a relationship between the potential employee and employer is built The Job Interview Process If an occupation seeker's resume passes the resume screen, the planned representative would like to learn more about the person applying for the job. In the midst of this screening strategy, managers much of the time focus on getting rid of hopefuls who are not fitting for the business or the condition. Nevertheless, a considerable number of people are gotten every month in the USA, even in extraordinary money related times. The articles around there will help you appreciate what you need to do, help you get prepared, and succeed. The best strategy to Answer the Common monitoring and evaluation interview questions is to get prepared. See, the most a significant part of the time in the interview is about knowing about your work experience, your interpersonal skills and your technical abilities Taking note of the Common Job Interview Questions is crucial and some of them are listed below. Examiners routinely ask comparative request in imminent representative gatherings. It's basic for them to do so, consistently working from a prepared once-over of request. After the gatherings are over, taking a gander at contenders is in like manner less requesting. if you like the content of this video to learn more about M&E please subscribe to this channel YouTube Video; https://youtu.be/QJBQIOmG1CA YouTube Channel; https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxxZi-3pPl3TCUPLsW-g7Yw Google Plus; https://plus.google.com/u/0/100637621... Twitter; https://twitter.com/manuscriptceo Facebook; https://web.facebook.com/profile.php?... below is a summary of the common interview questions asked Will you educate me a touch of concerning yourself? How might you be able to have possessed the capacity to you find out about the position? What do you think about the association? Why do you require this occupation? Why might it be a smart thought for us to contract you? What are you hunting down in another position? m&e officer interview questions | monitoring and evaluation interview questions | m&e interview questions | interview questions for m&e officer | monitoring and evaluation interview questions and answers | typical second interview questions
Views: 30772 M&E Made Simple
What Is The Evaluation Research
What is the evaluation research KNOW MORE ABOUT What is the evaluation research Evaluation research an overview evaluation overview muse. What is evaluation research? Meaning of research. Evaluation research can be defined as a type of study that uses standard social methods for evaluative purposes, specific methodology, and an assessment process employs special techniques unique to the evaluation programs is used determine impact intervention. Googleusercontent search. Design and implementation of evaluation research evaluating what is treatment research? What its relationship to the introduction it why do it? difference between evaluation? Research what's difference? . Evaluation research thus analyzes the impact of a particular program on certain social problem is trying to solve evaluation, refers purpose rather than speci]ic method. Interventions such as new treatment methods, innovations in services, and a host of others. Evaluation research is a form of applied it. Social research methods knowledge base evaluation researchsage publications ltdwhatiskt researchdefinition of by medical introduction to simple comparisons wikipediaprinciples for the ghent university. This purpose is to evaluate the impact of social. Evaluation research an overviewsocial methods evaluation wikibooks, open. Definition 1 evaluation research undertaken to see whether a program or activity is meeting has met the objectives looking for online definition of in medical dictionary? Evaluation explanation free. The introduction to evaluation research presents an overview of what is a set methods and associated methodologies with distinctive purpose. Intended to have some real world effect one specific form of social research evaluation is particular interest here. A social intervention is an action taken within a context designed to produce intended result. First, the international classification of impairments, activities 16 oct 2015 video created by national university singapore for course 'public relations research'. Now we have come full circle! began with a what makes good evaluation? How do i evaluation is process that critically examines program. It involves qualitative research evaluation methods 8 jan 2016 what images come to mind when you hear the word evaluation? A teacher grading an exam? dashboard or scorecard with outcomes 26 oct 2013 program activities are not considered human subject they do involve experimental non standard moreover, as of practice is one our end goals, we may also need define mean by. Definitions evaluation is the systematic assessment of worth or merit some object; Evaluation acquisition and researchers are confronted with evaluations at many times during their career. Definition evaluation research, or program evaluation, refers to the kind of applied social research that attempts evaluate effectiveness is a systematic determination subject's merit, worth and significance, using describe an assessment, investigation whilst others
Views: 20 Last Question
Scientific Writing and its Evaluations Using SWAN Software - Dr:Ali Hendi Algamdi
Scientific Writing and its Evaluations Using SWAN Software - Dr:Ali Hendi Algamdi
Views: 19 RSOS SEA
Teaching Evaluations: Biased Beyond Measure
(Visit: http://www.uctv.tv/) Student evaluations of teaching are widely used in academic personnel decisions as a measure of teaching effectiveness. Research shows that these evaluations are biased against female instructors by an amount that is large and statistically significant. Philip Stark, Professor of Statistics and Associate Dean at the UC Berkeley shows that gender biases can be large enough to cause more effective instructors to get lower scores than less effective instructors. Recorded on 04/11/2016. Series: "Center for Studies in Higher Education" [6/2016] [Education] [Show ID: 30870]
Teacher evaluation with standardised achievement tests: A policy fiasco
Presented by Professor David C. Berliner In the United States almost all recent designs of teacher evaluation systems rely on standardised tests of student achievement as a substantial part of, or all of the teacher evaluation process. These tests have one characteristic that makes them completely inappropriate for this purpose; namely, they are remarkably insensitive to teacher behaviour. Standardised achievement tests instead reflect demographic characteristics of the students who are tested. In this lecture Professor Berliner will explore how teachers impact individual students enormously, but affect standardised test results only a little. Professor David C. Berliner David C. Berliner is Regents' Professor of Education Emeritus at Arizona State University. He has also taught at the Universities of Arizona and Massachusetts, at Teachers College and Stanford University, and at universities overseas. He is a member of the National Academy of Education, the International Academy of Education, and a past president of both the American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the Division of Educational Psychology of the American Psychological Association (APA). Professor Berliner has authored more than 200 published articles, chapters and books. Among his best known works is the book co-authored with B. J. Biddle, The manufactured crisis, and the book co-authored with Sharon Nichols, Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts American education. He co-edited the first Handbook of educational psychology and the books Talks to teachers, and Perspectives on instructional time. His most recent co-authored book is: 50 myths and lies that threaten America's public schools.
ResEval: Research Impact Evaluation tool
This video highlights key features of the Research Impact Evaluation (ResEval) tool developed by the LiquidPub project. ResEval manages and computes metrics of scientific entities, such as authors and contributions. Supported metrics range from traditional citation-based metrics, such as h-index to novel metrics customly defined by users. Read more about ResEval at http://reseval.org/
Views: 297 liquidjournals
What is JOURNAL RANKING? What does JOURNAL RANKING mean? JOURNAL RANKING meaning & explanation
What is JOURNAL RANKING? What does JOURNAL RANKING mean? JOURNAL RANKING meaning - JOURNAL RANKING definition - JOURNAL RANKING explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it. They have been introduced as official research evaluation tools in several countries. Traditionally, journal ranking “measures” or evaluations have been provided simply through institutional lists established by academic leaders or through committee vote. These approaches have been notoriously politicized and inaccurate reflections of actual prestige and quality, as they would often reflect the biases and personal career objectives of those involved in ranking the journals; also causing the problem of highly disparate evaluations across institutions. Consequently, many institutions have required external sources of evaluation of journal quality. The traditional approach here has been through surveys of leading academics in a given field, but this approach too has potential for bias, though not as profound as that seen with institution-generated lists Consequently, governments, institutions, and leaders in scientometric research have turned to a litany of observed bibliometric measures on the journal-level that can be used as surrogates for quality and thus eliminate the need for subjective assessment Consequently, several journal-level metrics have been proposed, most citation-based: Impact factor – Reflecting the average number of citations to articles published in science and social science journals. Eigenfactor – A rating of the total importance of a scientific journal according to the number of incoming citations, with citations from highly ranked journals weighted to make a larger contribution to the eigenfactor than those from poorly ranked journals. SCImago Journal Rank – A measure of scientific influence of scholarly journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from. h-index – Usually used as a measure of scientific productivity and the scientific impact of an individual scientist, but can also be used to rank journals. Expert survey – A score reflecting the overall quality and/or contribution of a journal is based on the results of the survey of active field researchers, practitioners and students (i.e., actual journal contributors and/or readers), who rank each journal based on specific criteria. Publication power approach (PPA) – The ranking position of each journal is based on the actual publishing behavior of leading tenured academics over an extended time period. As such, the journal’s ranking position reflects the frequency at which these scholars published their articles in this journal. Altmetrics – Rate journals based on scholarly references added to academic social media sites. diamScore – A measure of scientific influence of academic journals based on recursive citation weighting and the pairwise comparisons between journals. Source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) – a factor released in 2012 by Elsevier based on Scopus to estimate impact. The measure is calculated as SNIP=RIP/(R/M), where RIP=raw impact per paper, R = citation potential and M = median database citation potential.....
Views: 407 The Audiopedia
Using Teacher Evaluation to Change Teaching
In this REL Mid-Atlantic Teacher Effectiveness webinar, participants became familiar with the research related to the use of teacher evaluations and they learned how various measures might be used to improve teaching. This webinar featured Courtney Bell, Ph.D., a former teacher and now a Senior Research Scientist at Educational Testing Service and the Understanding Teacher Quality Center. The content of these videos does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Institute of Education Sciences or the U.S. Department of Education, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Understanding 'Levels of Evidence' - What are Levels of Evidence?
This tutorial will explain levels of evidence, based on research study design, so that you can find the best evidence for your practice using a database. It was developed by the Physiotherapy Association of British Columbia for PABC members and for members of the Ontario Physiotherapy Association.
Views: 86896 BCPhysio
Teacher Evaluation: Actions and Research Possibilities - Allan Odden
This lecture was part of the 2012 CPRE Retreat, Session 1: Accountability and Evaluation Systems - Research and National Trends. In "Teacher Evaluation: Actions and Research Possibilities", CPRE co-director Allan Odden discusses the changing systems by which to evaluate and manage teachers in order to improve school organization and increase teacher effectiveness.
Views: 831 CPREresearch
Social Work 240: Developing an Outcome Evaluation Plan
SJSU ScWk 240: This lecture is focused on providing an example of how to create an outcome evaluation plan and linking outcome evaluation concepts to research methods concepts.
Views: 3531 Kathy Lemon
Pre-Operative Assessment  – Anesthesiology | Lecturio
This video “Pre-Operative Assessment” is part of the Lecturio course “Anesthesiology” ► WATCH the complete course on http://lectur.io/preoperativeassessment ► LEARN ABOUT: - Pre-operative assessment of the patient - Reasons for a pre-operative assessment - History of previous anesthetics of the patient - Physical assessment of the patient - Evaluation of the airway - How to use the Guedel airway - How to use the laryngeal mask airway - How to use the Stylet - How to use the Bougie - How to use Mallampati Score ► THE PROF: Your lecturer is Dr. Brian Warriner. He has been an active clinician and teacher in the University of British Columbia for years. He has published in various medical journals and was head of different anesthesiology departments. Dr. Warriner’s research is focused on the use of blood substitutes in surgical patients, the value of preoperative beta blockers, the reversal of muscle relaxants and the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. ► LECTURIO is your single-point resource for medical school: Study for your classes, USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2, MCAT or MBBS with video lectures by world-class professors, recall & USMLE-style questions and textbook articles. Create your free account now: http://lectur.io/preoperativeassessment ► INSTALL our free Lecturio app iTunes Store: https://app.adjust.com/z21zrf Play Store: https://app.adjust.com/b01fak ► READ TEXTBOOK ARTICLES related to this video: Types and Procedures of General Anesthesia http://lectur.io/preoperativeassessmentarticle ► SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel: http://lectur.io/subscribe ► WATCH MORE ON YOUTUBE: http://lectur.io/playlists ► LET’S CONNECT: • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lecturio.medical.education.videos • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lecturio_medical_videos • Twitter: https://twitter.com/LecturioMed
From an idea to a journal article: Using NVivo in early childhood studies
Trial NVivo free for 30 days: http://bit.ly/178Wn1s or visit the QSR International website: http://bit.ly/HyGdD3. NVivo is software that supports qualitative and mixed methods research. Join Dr Tuija Turunen from the University of Lapland, Finland, as she discusses her research on peoples' memories of starting school and how these memories influence how they deal with transitions later in life.
Views: 958 NVivo by QSR
EAPRIL - A self-evaluation tool to make course material more research informed
EAPRIL2014 - Flipping the Session - A self-evaluation tool to make course material more research informed Liesbeth Spanjers Group T University College, Belgium
Views: 61 EAPRIL vzw
Group Comparison: Evaluation of groups of researchers
GroupComp is a tool for the evaluation of research contributions for individuals and group of researchers. It uses citation-based metrics to quantify the research impact of a group. Read more about GroupComp at http://project.liquidpub.org/groupcomparison/.
Views: 91 liquidjournals
Improving mixed-method evaluations by incorporating logic models into NVivo
Trial NVivo free for 30 days: http://bit.ly/18RIn8w or visit the QSR International website: http://bit.ly/1fKBlde. NVivo is software that supports qualitative and mixed methods research. Improving mixed-method evaluations by incorporating logic models into NVivo Gareth Morrell, Senior Research Director of NatCen Social Research, Britain's leading independent social research agency In this eSeminar, Gareth will show how the content of a logic model can be incorporated into NVivo using the Framework© application to manage qualitative data, ensuring that the best is made of the qualitative data and that it can be systematically linked to data from other evaluation strands. Qualitative research can play a crucial role in programme evaluations. While Randomised Control Trials and quasi-experimental designs can assess whether a given intervention has worked, a parallel qualitative process evaluation can help us to understand why something works. This one-hour eSeminar will cover: - Using templates to systematically collect and analyze data - Organizing large amounts of data in an NVivo project - Creating nodes that further your research and evaluation efforts - Writing and using queries to inform stakeholders of programs and trends and to enhance organizational learning.
Views: 2767 NVivo by QSR
International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction
International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction Joanna Lumsden (Aston University, UK) Now Available Year Established: 2009 Publish Frequency: Quarterly ISSN: 1942-390X EISSN: 1942-3918 http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJMHCI.20180101 ___________ Description: The International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) brings together a comprehensive collection of research articles from international experts on the design, evaluation, and use of innovative handheld, mobile, and wearable technologies. This journal will also consider issues associated with the social and/or organizational impacts of such technologies. Emerging theories, methods, and interaction designs are included and complemented with case studies, which demonstrate the practical application of these new ideas. ___________ Topics Covered: Case studies and/or reflections on experience on experience (e.g. descriptions of successful mobile user interfaces, evaluation set-ups, etc.) Context-aware/context-sensitive mobile application design, evaluation, and use Design methods/approaches for mobile user interfaces Ethical implications of mobile evaluations Field-based evaluations and evaluation techniques Gestural interaction techniques for mobile technologies Graphical interaction techniques for mobile technologies Issues of heterogeneity of mobile device interfaces/interaction Lab v. field evaluations and evaluation techniques Lab-based evaluations and evaluation techniques Mobile advanced training application design, evaluation, and use Mobile assistive technologies design, evaluation, and use Mobile commerce application design, evaluation, and use Mobile HCI lab design/set-up Mobile healthcare application design, evaluation, and use Mobile interactive play design, evaluation, and use Mobile learning application design, evaluation, and use Mobile technology design, evaluation, and use by special (needs) groups (e.g. elderly, children, and disabled) Multimodal interaction on mobile technologies Non-speech audio-based interaction techniques for mobile technologies Other emerging interaction techniques for mobile technologies Other related issues that impact the design, evaluation, and use of mobile technologies Speech-based interaction techniques for mobile technologies Tactile interaction techniques for mobile technologies Technology acceptance as it relates to mobile technologies User aspects of mobile privacy, security, and trust User interface architectures for mobile technologies User interface migration from desktop to mobile technologies Wearable technology/application and interaction design, evaluation, and use ___________ Abstracted/Indexed In: Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) SCOPUS Compendex (Elsevier Engineering Index) PsycINFO® INSPEC ACM Digital Library Cabell's Directories DBLP GetCited Google Scholar HCIBIB JournalTOCs Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA) MediaFinder Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD) The Index of Information Systems Journals The Standard Periodical Directory Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
Views: 72 IGI Global
Scientific Writing and its Evaluations Using SWAN Software- third part
cientific Writing and its Evaluations Using SWAN Software- third part
Views: 32 RSOS SEA
Jamie Orlikoff: Board Chair Performance Evaluation
No individual board member has more influence on board culture and performance than the board chair. Yet, most boards do not conduct formal performance evaluations of their chairs. Effective boards strive to oversee their chairs; while ineffective boards are controlled by them. Periodically assessing board chair performance can help board's oversee their chairs and make a good chair even better. Board chair performance evaluation is a governance best practice. In this webinar governance expert Jamie Orlikoff reviews the rationale for board board chair evaluation, and outlines the step by step process for establishing an effective and productive board chair evaluation process. Jamie Orlikoff is president of Orlikoff & Associates, an international consulting firm specializing in health care governance and leadership, strategy, quality, organizational development, and risk management. He is the National Advisor on Governance and Leadership to the American Hospital Association and Health Forum. Jamie has been involved in leadership, quality, and strategy issues for over thirty years. He has consulted with hospitals and health systems in eleven countries, and since 1985 has worked with hospital and system governing boards to strengthen their overall effectiveness and their oversight of quality, safety and strategy. He has worked extensively on improving the relationships between boards, medical staffs, and management. He is the author of 15 books and over 100 articles and has served on hospital, college, and civic boards. Jamie has served as a member of the Virginia Mason Health System Board in Seattle, WA, and chair of their Governance Committee. © 2018 American Hospital Association
Formal vs  Informal Assessment & Examples
Check out this great Power Point Presentation on Teacher's Guide to Classroom Assessments for further understanding https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/Teachers-Guide-to-Assessments-3659168 found at my TPT store. Formal and Informal assessments are compared through examples, testing procedures, reference to students, and creation. This video begins with an introduction of what is a formal assessment and what is an informal assessment. The video progress through to outlining some specific differences in Formal and Informal Assessments. First off, how are formal and informal assessments different in the way they are created. Next both types of assessments are discussed as they pertain to school data. How are the assessments used to produce data, and what data goes into the production of each assessment? The differences are further described by going into details on the different testing procedures associated with each type of test or assessment. Then individuals will learn how formal and informal assessments relate to criterion referenced tests and norm referenced tests. Lastly, the video differentiated how teachers will use each type of assessment. Which assessments will be used as longitudinal data and which will not. Overall, this video offers a good overview of the differences of formal and informal assessments with many examples provided.
Views: 16950 Teachings in Education
Thomas Lüscher, Professor and Chairman of Cardiology at the University Hospital Zurich and Editor-in-Chief of the European Heart Journal, speaks with Jack V. Tu, Professor of Medicine at University of Toronto, and Leslie H. Curtis, Associate Professor in Medicine at Duke University, about the CANHEART Study at the Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas. http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org The European Heart Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Medicine. It is an official Journal of the European Society of Cardiology and is published weekly. The European Heart Journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Cardiovascular Medicine. It includes articles related to research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of Cardiovascular Medicine, including education issues. Used with permission of the European Society of Cardiology. Produced in association with Zurich House.
Process Evaluation Results of a Smarter Lunchrooms Study in New York State Middle Schools
School food environments are a common target of childhood obesity prevention initiatives, though buy-in from school staff is an essential component of project success. The Smarter Lunchrooms randomized controlled trial (RCT) was initiated in 2013 to test the effectiveness of select Smarter Lunchrooms practices in New York State middle schools. The 2016 iteration of this study was redesigned to examine the impact of buy-in – some schools were allowed to choose their intervention, while others were assigned an intervention protocol. Process evaluation was conducted in order to monitor protocol implementation and to determine barriers and facilitators to implementation. In this webinar, Alisha Gaines, PhD, from the Cornell University Division of Nutritional Sciences, overviews the process evaluation from the final year of the Smarter Lunchrooms RCT. Please note that plate waste results are not discussed, though a discussion of how process evaluation results can be applied to future research and practice is included. For more info and resources: http://articles.extension.org/pages/74281/process-evaluation-results-of-a-smarter-lunchrooms-study-in-new-york-state-middle-schools
2012 10 04 EES Conference: "Meta-evaluation of Evaluations of Local Climate Change Adaptation"
By Monica Lomena Gelis This presentation and related article are embedded in the author's PhD research which will contribute to the theory and practice of evaluation in Senegal through the Meta-evaluation of evaluations of local climate change adaptation initiatives. Building on an earlier analysis of the evaluation practice in Senegal, presented at the 6th AfrEA Conference in January 2012, this paper establishes the methodological framework to analyze the conception, process, results and the utilization of this type of evaluations and presents a preliminary version of a tailored Meta-Evaluation checklist. Meta-evaluation (hereafter MEv) is commonly defined as "the evaluation of evaluations". Its focus is how evaluations are done, not just their results or findings. More than forty years after Michael Scriven coined the term, there are few investigations which have evaluations as their main object of study, and there is still confusion with terms like "meta-analysis", "synthesis of evaluation results" and "systematic review". Meta-evaluation can be applied to individual evaluations, to a set of them, and even to the whole evaluation system in certain circumstances. MEv has been extensively used to foster the improvement of the quality of individual evaluations, frequently focusing on their methodological and robustness of the evidence. This paper explores another use of MEv: the MEv of a set of evaluations which can guide the management of the function and practice of evaluation within an institution or in a substantive policy sector. The article to be presented at the 10th EES Conference outlines the adaptation of the MEv methodology to real evaluations conducted over the past ten years in order to explore the evaluation practice of the local climate change adaptation sector in Senegal. This will contribute to clarify the evaluation function in this policy sector. The paper starts by introducing the concept and describing the methodology used to elaborate the MEv checklist proposed for this research. Afterwards, some frequently misunderstood concepts are presented in order to better distinguish Meta-evaluation. Different types of MEv are explained along with some practicalities of the recommended procedures for MEv, emphasizing the type chosen for the research: summative, ex-post external MEv of the conception, process, results and the utilization of evaluations. In order to craft a MEv checklist for evaluations of local climate change adaptation initiatives in Senegal, the article explores the grey literature on MEv in the field of international aid development and the standards for MEv or for evaluation quality assessment proposed in key academic articles. More than 20 meta-evaluative exercises of development aid covering the past ten years are analyzed, capturing their objectives, standards used and hypotheses. The standards for MEv commonly recommended by the literature and the major evaluation associations are then summarized. Finally, these two flows of information are used to tailor a MEv checklist, bearing in mind the epistemological perspective of MEv endorsed by the article and the context of the Senegalese evaluation system and practice explored in the author's earlier article. A preliminary version of the checklist, including sources of information and guiding Meta-evaluation questions, is proposed as a conclusion.
Views: 285 SEA Change CoP
Abstracts - evaluate articles
Use Abstracts to quickly evaluate articles.
Monitoring and Evaluation   Facts and Definitions
What is monitoring and evaluation? What is Monitoring? Monitoring is the systematic process of collecting, analyzing and using information to track a programme’s progress toward reaching its objectives and to guide management decisions. Monitoring usually focuses on processes, such as when and where activities occur, who delivers them and how many people or entities they reach. What is Evaluation? Evaluation is the systematic assessment of an activity, project, programme, strategy, policy, topic, theme, sector, operational area or institution’s performance. Evaluation focuses on expected and achieved accomplishments, examining the results chain (inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts), processes, contextual factors and causality, in order to understand achievements or the lack of achievements. Evaluation aims at determining the relevance, impact, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of interventions and the contributions of the intervention to the results achieved. Source: http://www.endvawnow.org/en/articles/330-what-is-monitoring-and-evaluation-.html
Keto vs. Low-Fat Research. Debunking the 'Holy Grail' Low Fat study Teaching You How To Read Studies
In this video: 1) a quick introduction to Dr. John Ioannidis. lecture: https://youtu.be/GPYzY9I78CI paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/ 2) Debunking the "Holy Grail" research of Sat. fat intake vs. LDL known as the Hegsted Equation, used by Low-Fat promoters everywhere. 3) Teaching you how Observational studies are lame since you cannot get Cause from them. You can only hypothesize. Yet people state "facts" from nutrition observational studies all the time for 100 years. 4) Teaching you how to interpret observational studies using "Relative Risk" aka "RR". 5) Teaching you how to go on Pubmed and find Human Randomized Controlled Trials. Enjoy! Please like, share, and subscribe to my YouTube page! Tap the bell to get notified when I post a new video! -Dr. Schmidt Please email [email protected] to become a patient and order the products we carry. Please do not use the YouTube comments section for personal questions that are appropriately addressed in a doctor-patient private conversation. Please do not start a question with “What about..?” or generally ask “Your thoughts, please”. Please reword your question to be very specific. Thank you! My Professional FB page: https://www.facebook.com/Lacticacidosisguide/ My office FB page: https://www.facebook.com/realfoodcures/ Buy Good Fat Bars here: https://www.goodfat.bar/ You have already taken the first step to better your health by watching my video! Next, I recommend that you join our office and become a patient. We have a local and a long distance program. You will get diet modifications and supplement recommendations designed specifically for you by me or one of my fellow practitioners in our Ann Arbor, Michigan office. You have to be a patient of our office in order to purchase most supplements per our distribution agreement with Standard Process and other brands that are only sold through physicians. Becoming a Local or Long Distance Patient as outlined below allows you that access.  In order to be part of our Long Distance Patient program, you would purchase an annual membership for $200. This membership includes an initial 30 minute phone appointment with me or one of our practitioners. At that time, the practitioner will make a recommendation to you for diet modifications, supplements and the quantities that you should take. After the phone call, you are able to order supplements for a year, as needed, directly from our website and our app. We will then promptly ship the supplements out to you.  Follow up phone calls with your practitioner are $125 for a 20 minute phone or skype appointment.  If you would like to move forward and take advantage of this opportunity, please call: (734) 302-7575 or email [email protected] to schedule, and make the $200 payment. You can reach us by phone Monday through Saturday 9am-5pm EST. To learn more about our office and clinical practice, go to: http://thenutritionalhealingcenter.com  Since not everyone is fortunate enough to live within driving distance of Ann Arbor, Michigan, and many feel that an telephone/online consultation is not enough to meet their clinical needs, I am happy to offer you our Long Distance Patient Travel Package. The package is comprised of a series of appointments in a few days with myself or another practitioner. Not only are your health issues of concern thoroughly evaluated, but you receive a comprehensive full body evaluation, two different computerized health evaluations and a great deal of teaching and health education. You leave with a program of diet modification and supplement support that the practitioner is confident will improve your health and quality of life. This program can initiate your relationship with our clinic, and be followed up with telephone/online consultations, or it can be incorporated into your already existing program with our clinic to further enhance the program you already have in place.  The cost for the Long Distance Travel Package is $560 and includes everything mentioned above. We also have a relationship with a lovely landmark hotel conveniently located 1 mile from our office that offers a reduced nightly rate to our patients.  In the meantime, if you are truly interested in what we have to offer, please watch the top 5 most important videos for you: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLNvew6525LFhZ-aewK4IxoHcQXgLlelw&disable_polymer=true We look forward to helping you feel your best!   DISCLAIMER: The products and the claims made about specific products on or through this site have not been evaluated by the United States Food and Drug Administration and are not approved to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease. Individual results may vary. You should not use the information on this site for diagnosis or treatment of any health problem or for prescription of any medication or other treatment. UCC 1-308 without prejudice.
Views: 5007 Dr. Darren Schmidt
US Cholesterol Guidelines
Thomas Lüscher, Professor and Chairman of Cardiology at the University Hospital Zurich and Editor-in-Chief of the European Heart Journal, speaks with Dr Noel Bairey Merz, Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre, Los Angeles, about the latest US Cholesterol Guidelines at the Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas. http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org The European Heart Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Medicine. It is an official Journal of the European Society of Cardiology and is published weekly. The European Heart Journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Cardiovascular Medicine. It includes articles related to research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of Cardiovascular Medicine, including education issues. Used with permission of the European Society of Cardiology. Produced in association with Zurich House.
How to create the conditions for innovative research and practice
Panel Session 2: How to Create the Conditions for Innovative Research and Practice in Impact Evaluation with Elliot Stern (chair), Marie Gaarder (World Bank), Colin Kirk (UNICEF), Ole Winckler Andersen (DANIDA), Oscar Garcia (UNDP) From the Impact, Innovation and Learning: Towards a Research and Practice Agenda for the Future event at the Institute of Development Studies March 26-27, 2013
Value and Evaluation: the ethics and politics of social responsibility by Paul Chan
How can the research methods we employ articulate the 'value(s)' of social responsibility in a valid, reliable and responsible manner? What do we do with these 'values', especially when they are competing? For more methods resources see: http://www.methods.manchester.ac.uk
Views: 213 methodsMcr
LitAssist Reporting
LitAssist™ is a tool that allows new and experienced researchers to critically evaluate research components to gain a scholarly understanding of research. Track details of your literature evaluations to keep you, the researcher, organized and focused. A great tool for completing dissertation and thesis literature reviews. LitAssist™ is also great for advanced researchers who want to stay organized when conducting research for articles or books. Learn how to report your evaluations from LitAssist
Views: 41 LitAssist
APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards
As part of its promotion of greater transparency and the assessment of rigor in psychological science, the American Psychological Association has released new Journal Article Reporting Standards for researchers seeking to publish in scholarly journals. The standards are specific to psychological research and offer guidelines on the information needed in a research article to ensure that the elements included are comprehensible and that the study can be replicated. The new standards: - Recommend the division of hypotheses, analyses and conclusions into primary, secondary and exploratory groupings to allow for a full understanding of quantitative analyses presented in a manuscript and enhance reproducibility. - Offer modules for authors reporting on N-of-1 design, replication, clinical trials, longitudinal studies and observational studies, as well as the analytic methods structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis. - Address the plurality of inquiry traditions, methods and goals, providing guidance on material to include across diverse qualitative research methods. - Provide standards for reporting research using mixed-method designs, drawing on both qualitative and quantitative standards. For more information: “Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report” - http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-amp0000151.pdf “Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report” - http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-amp0000151.pdf "Editorial: Journal Article Reporting Standards” - http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-amp0000263.pdf __ The American Psychological Association is the leading scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States, with more than 115,700 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students as its members. To learn more about the APA visit http://www.apa.org Follow APA on social media: Facebook https://www.facebook.com/AmericanPsychologicalAssociation/ Twitter https://twitter.com/apa LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/10738/ Google+ https://plus.google.com/+americanpsychologicalassociation
The Targeted Temperature Management (TTM) Trial
Dr Benjamin Abella, University of Pennysylvania and discussant at the American Heart Association, speaks with Dr. Niklas Nielsen, of Lund University, Sweden, about the Targeted Temperature Management (TTM) Trial for post-arrest care. http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org The European Heart Journal is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with Cardiovascular Medicine. It is an official Journal of the European Society of Cardiology and is published weekly. The European Heart Journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Cardiovascular Medicine. It includes articles related to research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. In addition it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of Cardiovascular Medicine, including education issues. Used with permission of the European Society of Cardiology. Produced in association with Zurich House.
Advances in Mixed Methods Research – John W. Creswell, PhD - Keynote at the 2016 CAQD conference
This presentation deals with the conjunction of qualitative and quantitative research, commonly refered to as "Mixed Methods". By the end of it, you will have ● A basic understanding of mixed methods research ● An understanding of 10 recent advances of this methodology ● Specific examples of these advances ● A checklist of advances to determine if your project is rigorous John W. Creswell, PhD is a Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, adjunct professor of Family Medicine and Co-Director of the Michigan Mixed Methods Research and Scholarship Program at the University of Michigan. He was founding Co-Editor for the Journal of Mixed Methods Research and has authored numerous articles and more than 25 books on mixed methods research, qualitative methodology, and general research design. This presentation was given at the MAXQDA user conference (CAQD) March 3rd, 2016. For more information on the CAQD, visit www.caqd.org
Views: 15372 CAQD
How To -Getting Started
Creating an evaluation of literature or research in LitAssist. This how-to video demonstrates how to enter a new evaluations and explains critical elements of LitAssist
Views: 1533 LitAssist
*360 Degree* (Performance Appraisals)
http://www.myhrpro.ca Watch this human resources video to learn how to do 360 degree appraisals without making mistakes that most companies make. Watch this hr video if you are serious about improving your performance appraisal system in your organization. In addition to our other HR videos in our series http://www.myhrpro.ca, here are some other resources from other sources. 360-degree feedback - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
This research suggests that 360-degree feedback and performance appraisals get at different outcomes, and that both 360-degree feedback and traditional ... What is 360 Degree Feedback ? 
What is 360 Degree Feedback? Companies use 360 degree feedback as a development tool and performance appraisal tool. What 360 feedback surveys do ... performance appraisals and sample appraisal form templates and http://www.businessballs.com › human resources
performance appraisals, performance evaluation and assessment of job skills, personality and behaviour - and tips for '360 degree feedback', '360° appraisals', ... Transparency Pays Off In 360-Degree Performance Reviews - WSJ http://www.online.wsj.com/.../SB10001424052970203501304577086592...
Dec 8, 2011 -- When it comes to workplace evaluations, many executives profit from seeing -- and sharing -- their reviews. 360 degree performance appraisal 
http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/360-degree-p... - United States
Apr 28, 2010 -- Free samples/examples 360 degree performance appraisal of Peers, Managers (i.e. superior), Subordinates, Team members, Customers, ... 360-degree Feedback: Weighing the Pros and Cons 
http://www.edweb.sdsu.edu/people/arossett/pie/.../360_1.htm - United States
by T Linman - Cited by 1 - Related articles 360-degree performance appraisals: More value, or just more to ...
360-degree performance appraisals: More value, or just more to ignore? Although it seems like performance evaluations should be a logical and productive part ... A 360-degree performance appraisal model dealing with ...

by M Espinilla - 2012 - Cited by 2 - Related articles How do 360 degree performance reviews affect - University of ...
 http://www.uri.edu/research/lrc/research/papers/Alexander_360.pdf What exactly is a 360 degree performance appraisal? - Task 
http://www.task.fm › Job & CareerShare
A 360 degree performance appraisal is a highly effective tool that can be utilised in a performance management program or as part of a self evaluation during a ... (performance appraisals) (performance appraisal system) (360 degree appraisals) (360 degree assessments) (Performance feedback) (hr consulting Edmonton) (calgary human resources) (human resources company) (human resources consulting company) (Performance management)(Performance improvement) (Performance feedback) (Feedback and coaching) (performance appraisal form) (appraisal) (what is 360 degree feedback) (360 degree feedback form) (360 performance appraisal) (360 degree feedback questionnaire) (performance management system) (myHRpro) (hr articles) (hr forms) (human resources articles) (human resources video
Views: 12922 myHRpro